MILWAUKEE— As the sixth day of Kyle Rittenhouse's trial unfolded Monday in Kenosha, at least one legal analyst counted part of the day's testimony as a win for Rittenhouse's defense team.

"I think the testimony this morning from Mr. [Gaige] Grosskreutz who was shot by Mr. [Kyle] Rittenhouse— there was some remarkable testimony from him about the chaotic nature of the scene, about how he himself feared for Mr. Rittenhouse's safety," John Gross, a clinical associate professor of law at the University of Wisconsin Law School and director of the Public Defender Project said. "His admission under cross-examination that at the time he was shot that he'd started to point his weapon at Mr. Rittenhouse— all of those things support the defense argument that [Rittenhouse] was acting in self-defense at that point."

While Gross has tracked what could be perceived by some as "wins" for Rittenhouse's defense team since jury selection began last Monday, he also acknowledged that the jury's going to have to answer some inherent questions which could benefit the prosecution.

"I think there will definitely be this pull on the jurors to say, "Why was he there? What did he hope to accomplish?!" Gross added. "I think the prosecution did a nice job this morning of setting up Mr. Grosskreutz as being there to render aid and assistance because he was a trained paramedic— Mr. Rittenhouse was not."

You can watch the full interview above.